Re: bgworker crashed or not?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Antonin Houska <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: bgworker crashed or not?
Date: 2014-05-08 01:01:53
Message-ID: 536AD781.6010207@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/08/2014 05:45 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I've pushed your rebased patch now with some further kibitzing,
> especially in regards to the documentation.

Thanks for tacking that Robert. It's great to have that API sorted out
before 9.4 hits and it's locked in.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2014-05-08 01:17:27 Re: 9.4 release notes
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-05-08 00:56:48 Re: PGDLLEXPORTing all GUCs?