| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views |
| Date: | 2014-04-29 14:40:05 |
| Message-ID: | 535FB9C5.7060506@joh.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/29/14 4:29 PM, Keith Fiske wrote:
> Was this ever committed into core? Apologies, I'm not very familiar with
> looking through the commit history of the source code and I don't see
> anything about this option or pretty-print outputs in the pg_dump/restore
> docs for 9.3. Had someone asking me about this feature for pg_extractor
No, the idea was rejected.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-04-29 14:45:34 | Re: includedir_internal headers are not self-contained |
| Previous Message | Keith Fiske | 2014-04-29 14:29:37 | Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views |