Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-22 00:44:21
Message-ID: 5355BB65.5050305@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 04/21/2014 03:08 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>
> On 4/21/14, 4:08 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great but
>> it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that no-one
>> in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates helping
>> us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.
>
> I assume you meant FreeBSD awesome for PostgreSQL? :)

Yes. Ty for the correction.

>
> I'm also a big fan of *BSD but the reality is it's MUCH harder to get
> *BSD into a corporation than linux. Now, if FreeBSD had a bunch of stuff
> that made PostgreSQL run like 4x faster on *BSD than Linux that would be
> a different story.

Exactly.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
Political Correctness is for cowards.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-04-22 00:49:18 Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-04-22 00:42:14 Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?