| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Buildfarm "master-next" branch? |
| Date: | 2014-04-18 01:08:41 |
| Message-ID: | 53507B19.3090707@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/17/2014 10:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> IMO the best single thing that could happen for the buildfarm is if
> we had more critters (at least twice as many) running a wider variety of
> platforms, compilers, and configuration options than there are today.
> More frequent runs would come out of that automatically.
I'll be bringing up a new Windows buildfarm member once I've got a
current project knocked off. It's a pretty fast dedicated Windows Server
2012 box with a wide range of SDKs on it that can do 32-bit and 64-bit
builds.
Should help a little.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2014-04-18 01:40:22 | Re: How can we make beta testing better? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-04-18 01:04:22 | Re: assertion failure 9.3.4 |