Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter
Date: 2017-04-08 13:48:16
Message-ID: 5345a762-8b1b-60b9-cba6-b2f8ce435971@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/7/17 5:33 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
>
> Also, can you add a test case? Cost values could make the test
> fragile, so if that gives you trouble I'll understand, but it'd be
> best to try and test this if possible.

This submission has been moved to CF 2017-07.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2017-04-08 13:51:39 Re: snapbuild woes
Previous Message David Steele 2017-04-08 13:46:33 Re: plpgsql - additional extra checks