| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
| Date: | 2014-04-09 07:03:51 |
| Message-ID: | 5344F0D7.7070905@vmware.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/09/2014 09:55 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> This would be greatly simplified if we can accept the restriction that
> there is only single
> snapshot per backend (not per transaction). To me this seems a
> completely sensible restriction.
Huh? In Read committed mode, every query within a transaction gets a
different snapshot.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-04-09 07:40:36 | libpq api wart: no PQconnect variant that can consume output of PQconninfoParse(...) |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-04-09 06:56:27 | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |