From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
Date: | 2014-04-07 06:50:29 |
Message-ID: | 53424AB5.6010506@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/07/2014 12:06 PM, Rajeev rastogi wrote:
> Syntax to create autonomous transaction can be as:
>
> */PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION;/*
Wouldn't you want to use SET TRANSACTION for this?
Or a suffix on BEGIN, like BEGIN AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION ?
What's the logic behind introducing "PRAGMA" ?
If you wanted to use that syntax for Oracle compatibility you'd need to use:
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
(note underscore). But really, this would no be a pragma at all,
PostgreSQL doesn't really have the concept. Calling it that would just
be misleading.
> *_Starting of Autonomous Transaction:_*
>
> Starting of autonomous transaction will be exactly same as starting
> sub-transaction.
If you don't want it to dirty read data from the parent tx, or inherit
parent locks, then it cannot be the same at all.
> 2. Freeing of all resource and popping of previous transaction
> happens in the same way as sub-transaction.
I'm not sure what you mean here.
Overall, this looks like a HUGE job to make work well. I know some
others have been doing work along the same lines, so hopefully you'll be
able to collaborate and share ideas.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-04-07 06:59:18 | Re: Pending 9.4 patches |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-04-07 06:42:03 | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |