Re: four minor proposals for 9.5

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: four minor proposals for 9.5
Date: 2014-03-20 08:47:59
Message-ID: 532AAB3F.3010809@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20/03/14 20:08, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-03-20 7:25 GMT+01:00 Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz
> Also I think this would probably only make sense for TEMPORARY
> tables - otherwise you can get this sort of thing going on:
>
> - you create a table and you have set a relation size limit
> - you commit and keep working
> - I add a whole lot of rows to your new table (taking it over the limit)
> - you go to add some more rows to this table...
>
>
> you cannot to across session limit and is not important if you do
> inserts more times or once.
>

Sorry Pavel - what you have said above is difficult for me to understand
- if the limit is intended as a *session* limit then concurrent activity
from multiple sessions makes it behave - well - strangely to say the
least, as tables are essentially shared resources.

Regards

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2014-03-20 08:59:33 Re: four minor proposals for 9.5
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2014-03-20 08:01:37 Re: Review: plpgsql.extra_warnings, plpgsql.extra_errors