Re: jsonb status

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: jsonb status
Date: 2014-03-19 20:13:43
Message-ID: 5329FA77.3070602@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 03/19/2014 03:58 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> * Jsonb vs JsonbValue is just bad, the latter needs to be renamed, and
>> there needs to be a very clear explanation about why two forms exist
>> and what each is used for.
> Agreed. We should probably emphasize the distinction.

Perhaps Oleg and Teodor might like to chime in on this.

>
>> * The whole datastructure doesn't have any sensible highlevel
>> documentation.

And this.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2014-03-19 20:16:42 Re: Review: plpgsql.extra_warnings, plpgsql.extra_errors
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-03-19 19:58:40 Re: jsonb status