| From: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install" |
| Date: | 2013-09-17 07:37:16 |
| Message-ID: | 5321362.FSBYHFvXvS@obelix |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Apt.pgdg got the patch present in postgresql head applyed.
>
> Erm, isn't apt.postgresql.org supposed to ship the *official*
> PostgreSQL versions? Given that this issue affects all distros, I
> don't see why Ubuntu/Debian need to be patched separately.
Well, the patches are applyed on the debian packages (not only in
apt.pgdg.org).
The packages provided by apt.postgresql.org are based on the 'official
packages' from debian. (if you allow me this circle)
> Does anyone else think this is problematic? By slipping patches into
> distro-specific packages, you're confusing users (like me) and
> bypassing the PostgreSQL QA process.
The QA is about distribution of packages here. Debian applies 14 patches
on 9.3 builds, not only the things about vpath we're talking about.
> PS: Where are the sources used to build packages on
> apt.postgresql.org?
9.3:
http://anonscm.debian.org/loggerhead/pkg-postgresql/postgresql-9.3/trunk/changes
--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2013-09-17 08:30:12 | Re: Minmax indexes |
| Previous Message | Samrat Revagade | 2013-09-17 06:45:56 | Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup |