| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" |
| Date: | 2014-03-11 16:43:11 |
| Message-ID: | 531F3D1F.9010306@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/11/2014 12:37 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Isn't the other issue for ISPs essentially that we don't have row-level
> security for our global catalogs? as in- we can't limit what's in
> pg_authid to only those entries a given user should be able to see? I
> don't think db_user_namespace addresses that issue (but I didn't go look
> either).
>
>
Possibly, but we don't have to solve every problem at once. As the
Sermon on the Mount says, "Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-11 17:23:06 | Re: Retain dynamic shared memory segments for postmaster lifetime |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-03-11 16:37:25 | Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" |