Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-02-12 21:23:21
Message-ID: 52FBE649.4050302@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/11/14, 7:04 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I don't see any use for that with plperl, but it might be a valid thing
> to be doing for (e.g.) hstore.dll. Though you can't really link to it
> from another module anyway, you have to go through the fmgr to get
> access to its symbols at rutime, so we can probably just skip generation
> of import libraries for contribs and PLs.

There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly.
Would that be affected by this?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-02-12 21:28:46 Re: Terminating pg_basebackup background streamer
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-02-12 21:04:55 Re: issue with gininsert under very high load