| From: | Marco Atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2014-02-09 16:09:01 |
| Message-ID: | 52F7A81D.3000602@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/02/2014 14:10, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 02/09/2014 01:12 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/02/2014 00:06, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/08/2014 05:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>>>> Though I'm not a MINGW expert at all, I know dllwrap is a deprecated
>>>>> tool and dlltool is almost a deprecated tool. Cygwin port is removing
>>>>> the use of dllwrap and dlltool now. Isn't it better for MINGW port to
>>>>> follow it?
>>>> Only way to make that happen is to prepare and test a patch ...
>>>
>>> Yeah. Incidentally, we didn't quite get rid of dlltool for Cygwin. We
>>> did get rid of dllwrap. But I agree this is worth trying for Mingw.
>>>
>>
>> we should have get rid of dlltool on cygwin.
>> At least it is not used on my build
>>
>> Regards
>> Marco
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> The send in a patch. The patch you sent in previously did not totally
> remove it IIRC.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
attached patch versus latest git.
except prepared_xacts test all others are fine
=======================
All 140 tests passed.
=======================
Regards
Marco
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| postgresql-cygwin.patch | text/plain | 2.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-02-09 16:22:37 | Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2014-02-09 14:30:10 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |