adt Makefile, was Re: jsonb and nested hstore

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: adt Makefile, was Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Date: 2014-02-06 16:18:47
Message-ID: 52F3B5E7.6040508@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 02/01/2014 05:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile b/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
>> >index 1ae9fa0..fd93d9b 100644
>> >--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
>> >+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
>> >@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ OBJS = acl.o arrayfuncs.o array_selfuncs.o array_typanalyze.o \
>> > tsquery_op.o tsquery_rewrite.o tsquery_util.o tsrank.o \
>> > tsvector.o tsvector_op.o tsvector_parser.o \
>> > txid.o uuid.o windowfuncs.o xml.o rangetypes_spgist.o \
>> >- rangetypes_typanalyze.o rangetypes_selfuncs.o
>> >+ rangetypes_typanalyze.o rangetypes_selfuncs.o \
>> >+ jsonb.o jsonb_support.o
> Odd, most OBJS lines are kept in alphabetical order, but that doesn't
> seem to be the case here.

This whole list is a mess, and we don't even have all the range_types
files following each other.

Worth cleaning up?

I'm actually wondering if it might be worth having some subgroups of
object files and then combining them into $OBJS.

Or it could just be left more or less as is - it's hardly a breakthrough
advance.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2014-02-06 16:31:48 Re: Small GIN optimizations (after 9.4)
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-02-06 15:32:51 Re: extension_control_path