| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2014-02-04 20:53:46 |
| Message-ID: | 52F1535A.5090300@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>
> Do you know about what it would cost? Could official community funds
> be used for it (it seems like something that is cheap, but which you
> wouldn't want to be forgotten about some month.)
>
> Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is
> still insanely slow. Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so
> there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes. And a make after
> a "make clean" takes half an hour. This is on an actual desktop, not
> an AWS micro instance. So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the
> MSVC build faster?
>
>
Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have
major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4"
on a decent linux box.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2014-02-04 21:23:19 | Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan |
| Previous Message | Christian Kruse | 2014-02-04 20:30:08 | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |