Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-02-03 14:57:46
Message-ID: 52EFAE6A.1070307@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 02/03/2014 01:13 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm not a fan of MinGW (gcc) on Windows, it's a right pain. It's also
>> the only open source compiler currently supported for PostgreSQL on
>> Windows - practically the only one available. I don't know about you,
>> but I'm not too keen on assuming Microsoft will continue to offer free
>> toolchains that're usable for our purposes. They're crippling their free
>> build tools more and more with each release, which isn't a good trend.
> I was under the impression that Microsoft had finally come around to
> implementing a few C99 features in Visual Studio 2013 precisely
> because they want there to be an open source ecosystem on Windows.
>
>

It's not so long ago that they were saying they would no longer publish
free-as-in-beer command line compilers at all. The outrage made them
change their minds, but we really can't rely on only Microsoft compilers
for Windows.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-02-03 15:04:20 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Previous Message amihay gonen 2014-02-03 14:34:59 Q: How to use indexer api smartly