Re: [PATCH] Support for pg_stat_archiver view

From: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for pg_stat_archiver view
Date: 2014-02-01 17:43:44
Message-ID: 52ED3250.7080900@2ndQuadrant.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Michael and Fujii,

Il 01/02/14 17:46, Fujii Masao ha scritto:
> I think that it's OK to add that as TODO item. There might be
> the system that the speed of WAL archiving is slower than
> that of WAL generation, at peak time. The DBA of that system
> might want to monitor the size of archive queue.
I agree that it is an interesting thing to do. The reason I didn't
introduce it in the first place was that I did not want to make too many
changes in this first attempt.
> We can implement this by just counting the files with .ready
> extension in pg_xlog/archive_status directory. Or we can also
> implement that by adding new counter field in pg_stat_archiver
> structure, incrementing it whenever creating .ready file, and
> decrementing it whenever changing .ready to .done.
I would love to give it a shot at the next opportunity.

Thanks,
Gabriele

--
Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it | www.2ndQuadrant.it

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-02-01 20:19:17 Re: What is happening on buildfarm member crake?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2014-02-01 16:46:54 Re: [PATCH] Support for pg_stat_archiver view