Re: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE ( ... LIKE ... )

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE ( ... LIKE ... )
Date: 2014-01-31 17:16:18
Message-ID: 52EBDA62.9020902@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/25/2014 06:25 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>> I like this patch, but I don't like its implementation at all.
>> >
>> > First of all, the documentation doesn't compile:
>> >
>> > openjade:ref/create_foreign_table.sgml:124:17:E: end tag for "LISTITEM"
>> > omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
>> > openjade:ref/create_foreign_table.sgml:119:4: start tag was here
> Fixed.
>
>> > I fixed that, and then noticed that like_option is not explained like it
>> > is in CREATE TABLE.
> Also fixed.
>
>> > Then I got down to the description of the LIKE clause in both pages, and
>> > I noticed the last line of CREATE TABLE, which is "Inapplicable options
>> > (e.g., INCLUDING INDEXES from a view) are ignored.". This is
>> > inconsistent with the behavior of this patch to throw errors for
>> > inapplicable options.
> Fixed.
>
> Please find attached the next rev :)

This version looks committable to me, so I am marking it as such.

--
Vik

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-01-31 17:19:18 Re: [HACKERS] Insert result does not match record count
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-01-31 17:09:00 Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun