Re: array_length(anyarray)

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostGreSql hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array_length(anyarray)
Date: 2014-01-10 09:52:21
Message-ID: 52CFC2D5.4080506@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/10/14, 10:41 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> What's needed for better iteration support (IMO)
> is a function that does what unnest does but returns an array on
> indexes (one per dimsension) -- a generalization of the
> _pg_expandarray function. Lets' say 'unnest_dims'.

So unnest_dims('{{1,2},{3,4}}'::int[]) would return VALUES (1,
'{1,2}'::int[]), (2, '{3,4}'::int[])? If so, then yes, that's a
functionality I've considered us to have been missing for a long time.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2014-01-10 10:00:40 Re: array_length(anyarray)
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2014-01-10 09:43:51 Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)