| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: autovacuum_work_mem |
| Date: | 2013-12-11 21:10:59 |
| Message-ID: | 52A8D4E3.9010603@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/11/2013 12:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> And, for that matter, accepting this patch by no means blocks doing
>> something more sophisticated in the future.
>
> Yeah. I think the only real argument against it is "do we really need
> yet another knob?". Since Josh, who's usually the voicer of that
> argument, is for this one, I don't have a problem with it.
This passes the "is it a chronic problem not to have a knob for this?" test.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-12-11 21:14:24 | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-11 20:40:18 | Re: autovacuum_work_mem |