| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3 |
| Date: | 2013-12-10 21:26:23 |
| Message-ID: | 52A786FF.9040409@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/10/2013 12:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> One would hope that turning off check_function_bodies would be sufficient
> to disable any added checking, though, so I don't see this being a problem
> for pg_dump. But there might be other scenarios where an additional knob
> would be useful.
I can't think of one, offhand. And +1 for NOT adding a new knob.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-12-10 21:33:29 | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-10 21:17:47 | Re: Why standby.max_connections must be higher than primary.max_connections? |