From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Date: | 2013-12-05 15:52:47 |
Message-ID: | 52A0A14F.4080400@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/5/13, 6:07 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 5 December 2013 01:55, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 12:11 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> If an application wants to allow these connection parameters to be
>>> used, it would need to do PQenableStartServer() first. If it doesn't,
>>> those connection parameters will be rejected.
>>
>> Stupid idea: Would it work that we require an environment variable to be
>> set before we allow the standalone_backend connection parameter? That's
>> easy to do, easy to audit, and doesn't require any extra code in the
>> individual clients.
>
> I like the idea... should it be in pg_hba.conf ?
> Or should it be next to listen_addresses in postgresql.conf?
No, it's an environment variable.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-05 15:52:50 | Re: Proposal: variant of regclass |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-05 15:52:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |