Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Date: 2013-12-04 15:32:41
Message-ID: 529F4B19.1050705@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/04/2013 04:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/4/13, 2:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> running a
>> few kvm instances that get bootstrapped automatically is something that
>> is a solved problem.
>
> Is it sound to run performance tests on kvm?

as sounds as on any other platform imho, the performance characteristics
will differ between bare metal or other virtualisation platforms but the
future is virtual and that is what a lot of stuff runs on...

Stefan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Corbet 2013-12-04 15:33:45 Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-04 15:30:51 Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO