Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Date: 2013-12-03 22:44:13
Message-ID: 529E5EBD.1060701@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/03/2013 12:15 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> We are in no way different and I would like to note that we do not have
> any form of sensible performance related regression testing either.
> I would even argue that there is ton more regression testing (be it
> performance or otherwise) going into the linux kernel (even on a
> relative scale) than we do and pointing the finger at something they are
> dealing with once noticed.
> If we care about our performance on various operating systems it is
> _OUR_ responsibility to track that closely and automated and report back
> and only if that feedback loop fails to work we are actually in a real
> position to consider something as drastical as considering a platform
> "undependable" or looking into alternatives (like directIO).

Would certainly be nice. Realistically, getting good automated
performace tests will require paying someone like Greg S., Mark or me
for 6 solid months to develop them, since worthwhile open source
performance test platforms currently don't exist. That money has never
been available; maybe I should do a kickstarter.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-12-03 22:55:40 Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-03 22:35:29 Re: [bug fix] "pg_ctl stop" times out when it should respond quickly