Re: Draft release notes for 9.3.2

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for 9.3.2
Date: 2013-12-02 18:51:28
Message-ID: 529CD6B0.1010801@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

"The issue can be ameliorated by, after upgrading, vacuuming all tables
in all databases while having vacuum_freeze_table_age set to zero. "

Why not say:

"This issue can be ameliorated by, after upgrading, running a
database-wide VACUUM FREEZE."

Or is there a difference in this case? If so, what?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2013-12-02 19:06:16 Re: Extension Templates S03E11
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2013-12-02 18:47:51 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency