Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date: 2011-02-18 03:45:29
Message-ID: 5298.1298000729@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we have a few TODO items here:
>>
>> * Invent ... and document ... an API that permits safe assembly of a
>> parameter list from non-constant (and perhaps untrustworthy) values.
>>
>> * Fix xslt_process' failure to report (some?) errors detected by libxslt.
>>
>> * Move the functionality to a less deprecated place.
>>
>> None of these are within the scope of the current patch though.

> Should any of these be added to our TODO list under XML?

Yes, all of them, since nothing's been done about any of 'em ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru HANADA 2011-02-18 04:15:29 Re: CommitFest 2011-01 as of 2011-02-04
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2011-02-18 03:42:17 Re: COPY ENCODING revisited