Re: nested hstore patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: nested hstore patch
Date: 2013-11-19 16:04:25
Message-ID: 528B8C09.3020307@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 11/19/2013 11:00 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:51:06AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I think this was the consensus solution when this was last discussed,
>>> and I support it. There is similar space for a binary XML data type
>>> if someone feels like implementing it. I think the names that were
>>> proposed previously were something like jsonb and xmlb.
>> The natural name is OBJSON, meaning object JSON, because as PostgreSQL
>> people, we have to double-use letters wherever possible. ;-)
> Personally, I think the patch author should just run ps auxww | md5 |
> sed 's/^[^0-9]//' | cut -c1-8 and call the new data type by the
> resulting name.
>

My personal vote goes for "marmaduke". I've been dying to call some
builtin object that for ages.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-11-19 16:07:53 Re: Review: pre-commit triggers
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-11-19 16:00:09 Re: nested hstore patch