Re: additional json functionality

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: additional json functionality
Date: 2013-11-16 00:32:30
Message-ID: 5286BD1E.50207@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/15/2013 04:00 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> Looking at this a different way: could we just implement BSON and leave json
> alone?
>
> http://bsonspec.org/

In short? No.

For one thing, our storage format is different from theirs (better,
frankly), and as a result is not compliant with their "standard".

That's a reason why we won't use the name BSON, either, since it's a
trademark of 10gen.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-11-16 00:44:08 Re: additional json functionality
Previous Message David Johnston 2013-11-16 00:00:10 Re: additional json functionality