Re: Removal of archive in wal_level

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removal of archive in wal_level
Date: 2013-11-04 15:52:56
Message-ID: 5277C2D8.2060303@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/4/13, 8:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Please find attached a patch doing what is written in the $subject.
>> With the documentation updated, this is even better...
>
> I'm unconvinced that there's any value in this.

Yeah, the only thing this will accomplish is to annoy people who are
actually using that level. It would be more interesting if we could get
rid of the wal_level setting altogether, but of course there are valid
reasons against that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-11-04 15:55:30 Re: dsm use of uint64
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-11-04 15:46:06 Re: dsm use of uint64