Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Date: 2013-10-10 18:44:12
Message-ID: 5256F57C.6080809@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/10/13 11:31 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let me walk through the idea of adding an available_mem setting, that
> Josh suggested, and which I think addresses Robert's concern about
> larger shared_buffers and Windows servers.

I think this is a promising idea. available_mem could even be set
automatically by packages. And power users could just set available_mem
= -1 to turn off all the magic.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-10-10 18:44:51 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-10-10 18:44:04 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem