Re: [HACKERS] Urgent Help Required

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Urgent Help Required
Date: 2013-10-10 02:04:09
Message-ID: 52560B19.3060109@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 10/8/2013 8:35 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> First, while vacuum is usually preferred to vacuum full, in this case,
> I usually find that vacuum full clears up enough cruft to be worth it
> (not always, but especially if you are also having performance issues).

IIRC, vacuum full was pretty broken in 8.1, which the output the
original postered showed indicated they were running.

--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sudhir P.B. 2013-10-10 02:05:23 Forms for entering data into postgresql‏
Previous Message ginkgo36 2013-10-10 01:53:22 Re: String reverse funtion?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-10-10 02:11:38 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-10-10 01:34:16 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem