| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
| Date: | 2008-07-22 21:54:29 |
| Message-ID: | 5254.1216763669@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Agreed, but I think the best response to that is something CPAN-like
>> for people to easily get hold of recognized extensions,
> It seems to me a better solution is to have appropriate repositories for
> distributions that have them than some cpan style thing that is going to
> break package dependencies.
Better than CPAN is no problem ;-). My point is just that we should
exploit PG's extensibility rather than assume that everything
interesting must wind up in the core tarball.
> apt-get install postgresql-plproxy
> portinstall (I think that is the command) postgresql-plproxy
I believe Devrim already has a yum repository up and running for
RPM-based distros, though I'm not sure he's got anything but the core
packages in it (yet).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-07-22 22:02:03 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-07-22 21:44:58 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |