Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Date: 2014-06-19 00:43:36
Message-ID: 5224.1403138616@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Counter-argument: most app frameworks which do an automatic BEGIN; also
> do other stuff like SET TIMEZONE each time as well. Is this really a
> case worth worrying about?

SET TIMEZONE doesn't result in taking a snapshot either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G Johnston 2014-06-19 01:36:26 Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-06-19 00:15:14 Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels