| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
| Date: | 2013-08-22 23:21:15 |
| Message-ID: | 52169CEB.3090906@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/20/2013 05:48 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/8/20 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>>> I think the way forward is to remove the restriction such that data
>>> returning queries must be PERFORM'd
>>
>>
>> I disagree, current rule has sense.
>
> Curious what your thinking is there.
I have to agree with Merlin. I've always thought the PERFORM thing was
a wart we'd get around to removing eventually. In what way is it a feature?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-08-22 23:35:32 | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
| Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2013-08-22 23:14:35 | Re: System catalog vacuum issues |