Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, amutu(at)amutu(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour
Date: 2013-08-21 10:32:20
Message-ID: 52149734.2030905@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 08/14/2013 11:27 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:31:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:19:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Attached are docs that add the new syntax, and mention it is
>>> non-standard; you can see the output here:
>>>
>>> http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-SQL
>>>
>>> We do document three syntaxes for substring() in the same table, one row
>>> for each, so there is precedent for doing this.
>> Attached is an updated patch with a proper example. I could move the
>> extra syntax into the description of the existing trim entry instead.
> Patch applied to head. I did not apply this to 9.3 in case we change
> our minds about documenting this.

This commit introduced the following:

doc$ make -s html
Processing HTML.index...
2409 entries loaded...
collateindex.pl: duplicated index entry found: TRIM
1 entries ignored...
Done.
--
Vik

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-08-21 11:33:40 Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour
Previous Message bughunt 2013-08-21 10:08:56 BUG #8391: JDBC API links incomplete

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ciifrancesco@tiscali.it 2013-08-21 10:56:11 R: [pgsql-zh-general] (solved - 谢谢) Chinese in Postgres
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-08-21 08:57:15 Re: Backup throttling