| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
| Date: | 2013-08-07 19:07:32 |
| Message-ID: | 52029AF4.9080705@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce,
> Actually, for me, motiving reviewers seems like the Lemon-Soaked Paper
> Napkins, as it requires unbounded effort and its importance is not being
> balanced with other priorities.
Let me be absolutely clear here: You do not think that the work
reviewers do is important at all, and you think that our project has
more than enough reviewers? I want to be crystal-clear on your opinion.
I will point out that you did exactly zero reviews in the last
commitfest, which makes me wonder what your opinion of "we have enough
reviewers" is based on.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-08-07 19:18:37 | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-08-07 18:38:36 | Re: StrategyGetBuffer optimization, take 2 |