| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: UNNEST (and other functions) WITH ORDINALITY |
| Date: | 2013-07-29 08:32:49 |
| Message-ID: | 51F628B1.107@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/29/2013 04:31 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 07/29/2013 09:56 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Unless LATERAL provides a way to do lock-step iteration through a pair
>> (or more) of functions I don't think we can get rid of SRFs-in-FROM just
>> yet.
>
> I don't think anyone was arguing for that; we're talking about
> deprecating SRFs-in-SELECT.
Argh, as I was I. A thinko; I was *thinking* SELECT and wrote FROM.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-07-29 09:25:19 | ToDo: possible more rights to database owners |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2013-07-29 08:31:11 | Re: Review: UNNEST (and other functions) WITH ORDINALITY |