| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.4] row level security |
| Date: | 2013-07-23 22:48:15 |
| Message-ID: | 51EF082F.2080008@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/23/2013 03:34 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> I happen to think the review structure is one of the most important
> components to PostgreSQL release quality. It used to be a single level
> review with just the committers, now it's a two level structure. The
> reason the Postgres code is so good isn't that the submitted development
> is inherently any better than other projects. There's plenty of bogus
> material submitted here. It's the high standards for review and commit
> that are the key filter. The importance of the process to the result
> isn't weighed as heavily as I think it should be.
I think we're in violent agreement here. Now, we just need to convince
everyone else on this list.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-07-23 22:53:25 | Re: Performance problem in PLPgSQL |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2013-07-23 22:34:22 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |