From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: MVCC catalog access |
Date: | 2013-07-02 15:37:37 |
Message-ID: | 51D2F3C1.2030002@vmware.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02.07.2013 18:24, Andres Freund wrote:
> I've quickly verified that it indeed uses them. I wish I hadn't. Brrr. I
> can't even guess what that should do from the surrounding code/function
> names. Except that it looks broken under concurrency as long as
> SnapshotNow is used (because the query's snapshot won't be as new as
> SnapshotNow, even in read committed mode).
>
> Heikki, do you understand the code well enough to explain it without
> investing time?
No, sorry. I think it has something to do with updateable cursors, but I
don't understand the details.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2013-07-02 16:02:01 | Re: Randomisation for ensuring nlogn complexity in quicksort |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-07-02 15:37:13 | Re: Custom gucs visibility |