Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch

From: Liming Hu <dawninghu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Date: 2013-06-29 21:17:12
Message-ID: 51CF4ED8.8010505@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 6/29/2013 1:37 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/25/2013 01:37 PM, Liming Hu wrote:
>>> please remove "dameraulevenshteinnocompatible" related stuff, I
>>> just followed the template you created.
>>> "dameraulevenshteinnocompatible" was used in my first testing.
>>> diff -cNr
>>> /opt/src/pgsql-git/master/contrib/fuzzystrmatch/fuzzystrmatch--1.0.sql
>>>
>>>
> diff -cNr
> /opt/src/pgsql-git/master/contrib/fuzzystrmatch/fuzzystrmatch--unpackaged--1.0.sql
>
> Actually, given that this change will create version 1.1 of the
> extension, I believe the 1.0 versions of the sql scripts should
> probably be removed entirely. Can someone with more knowledge of the
> extension facility comment on that?
>
> Joe
Thanks. It is my first contribution to Postgresql community.

LIming
>
> - --
> Joe Conway
> credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
> Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
> Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRz0V5AAoJEDfy90M199hl3sgP/Ai51I56A7luUhRFt2s3eo0p
> HWiuxsWU2tXwoGmvYFtSze80mpfBfCGpBrD+uhh2PLZlFt6uS21wpYaezr1Y9wAM
> astvWAOXVOg/AUlb5lyoAze5CL3kpRVX7EvUPGrzb6RMK3VfIckRdIoqwh8/Ko/C
> j1ECEcWMHsRDUUDs+kU/mXAyRKpnC+VdSwOAU/k3J7Q0KpSvCZ4R+codinR29Ub4
> L4W30436IKOr+BktorFc24FYRpVVG2llMPtWUhgKb1MfW5d+NRqID0gTIF4a9TJr
> yaEBmmT1eupdje4pwY3R+xDGroCj3AAx7PAfW+CRMrsYvEFVy945l2lbSjvqDlDy
> lpFsWWepYNdQhZBKP0Au986aqTKmoKgFoyWV/Yi7BfLx7Gh70Wk8OPcDKuUIdHou
> UNfMouAUxGW9ZHZRmDSaYncTnLEcEJS11akddoIKDXCbdTVAQXFGLNqv1pp0KN+J
> xU1eOrh+oQVwTayZH+S2Xa8+AT+g9wLH5zynJozDSRitdLIGdN1zzUVVXdO1Nx2i
> 2anxXdoW4DB+x+G8ea2Wmxfsw3MMS8Ck10VqhN6JMojDP0rczA6+EFrZcBlsWlWx
> LX4iPTroUGZ318IC+A2CXci0uXs7+2l2zrescpEdqrqcTwTJHpGFbRbYniGBFgXW
> 6LeSPHhRDQUykXMvEU9I
> =xeVQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-06-29 21:59:35 Re: New regression test time
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-06-29 21:14:37 Re: New regression test time

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2013-06-30 02:55:16 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Previous Message Joe Conway 2013-06-29 20:37:13 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch