| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | stefan(at)drees(dot)name, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql(at)jamponi(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) |
| Date: | 2013-06-11 17:45:15 |
| Message-ID: | 51B7622B.9080706@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/11/13 12:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Personally I think this patch should go in regardless -- the concerns
> made IMNSHO are specious.
That's nice, but we have this process for validating whether features go
in or not that relies on review instead of opinions.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Drees | 2013-06-11 17:49:55 | Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) |
| Previous Message | Stefan Drees | 2013-06-11 17:39:48 | Re: DO ... RETURNING |