| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DO ... RETURNING |
| Date: | 2013-06-10 20:13:13 |
| Message-ID: | 51B63359.2010200@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/10/2013 09:34 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> If I understand the proposal correctly, the idea is only to try to
> return something when DO is invoked with RETURNING.
>
> 1. Did I understand correctly, Hannu?
Yes.
Of course we could default it to "RETURNS SETOF RECORD" :)
> 2. If I did, does this alleviate your concerns, Pavel?
>
> Cheers,
> David.
--
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Consultant
Performance, Scalability and High Availability
2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2013-06-10 20:21:03 | Re: DO ... RETURNING |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-06-10 19:48:16 | Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses |