| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Running pgindent |
| Date: | 2013-05-31 19:51:30 |
| Message-ID: | 51A8FF42.9080601@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/29/2013 11:41 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:08:10PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
>>> Wow, uh, yeah, I guess we could do that. I will await more feedback.
>> Please don't. I'm already rather concerned by this one. It looks like
>> there's a rule to pull a line in to meet the max-column requirement even
>> when that makes things line up 'funny', eg:
> I did a comparison of the parameters passed to BSD indent, and Andrew
> did accurately transfer all the flags, so I am a little confused why
> there is such a difference, as BSD indent has not changed.
I spent quite a lot of time trying to make the tool behave the same as
the old script.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-05-31 19:53:14 | Re: detecting binary backup in progress |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2013-05-31 19:46:24 | Re: detecting binary backup in progress |