| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
| Date: | 2013-05-29 04:08:03 |
| Message-ID: | 51A57F23.4060208@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 05/28/2013 07:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Perhaps just documenting the behavior is all that is needed, but -U is
>> everywhere and I think that's a good thing.
>
> [ moved to hacker ]
>
> Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u.
> Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4? I can keep supporting -u
> as an undocumented option.
Yes, -U makes the most sense as that is what is used with the other
tools. I think you should just drop -u, this isn't something people are
doing everyday (like psql). The backward compatibility argument is
pretty slim.
JD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | YuChi | 2013-05-29 08:57:05 | Re: Help, How to start the server?? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-05-29 02:55:20 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Farina | 2013-05-29 06:04:16 | Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-05-29 03:50:15 | Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0 |