Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Date: 2013-05-28 15:56:31
Message-ID: 51A4D3AF.9060708@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> This argument comes up every couple of years and the people that
>> are trying to solve the problem by changing the versioning are
>> ignoring the fact that there is no problem to solve.

We just had this discussion on -advocacy (where it belongs, frankly) a
couple months ago:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/512E8EF8.3000507@agliodbs.com

To sum up: the negatives of changing our version numbering scheme
outweighed the positives.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-05-28 15:58:49 Re: Extent Locks
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-05-28 15:53:33 Re: Extent Locks