Re: lock support for aarch64

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock support for aarch64
Date: 2013-05-13 13:15:20
Message-ID: 5190E768.3000308@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13.05.2013 15:39, Mark Salter wrote:
> I used the following patch to add lock support aarch64. It is just a
> copy of the arm support based on gcc builtins. Postgresql built with
> this patch passes the various tests.

I think this needs an "#ifdef HAVE_GCC_INT_ATOMICS", like the ARM codepath.

If we are to support aarch64, it would be good to have an aarch64
machine on the buildfarm. Could you arrange that? See
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Nelson 2013-05-13 13:24:24 Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-05-13 12:50:03 Better LWLocks with compare-and-swap (9.4)