Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax

From: Karol Trzcionka <karlikt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Date: 2013-05-02 21:46:29
Message-ID: 5182DEB5.6070505@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

W dniu 02.05.2013 23:34, Gavin Flower pisze:
> I prefer 'PRIOR & 'AFTER' as the both have the same length
> - but perhaps that is just me! :-)
I think it doesn't matter at now because PRIOR has the same problems as
BEFORE ;)
Regards,
Karol

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-05-02 22:00:03 matview niceties: pick any two of these three
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2013-05-02 21:34:17 Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax