| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 |
| Date: | 2008-07-07 20:13:15 |
| Message-ID: | 5170D103-1110-4302-895C-5669AEA4D236@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 7, 2008, at 13:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> We intentionally force such strings to be considered non-equal.
> See varstr_cmp, and if you like see the archives from back when
> that was put in.
>
> The = and <> operators are in fact consistent with the behavior of
> varstr_cmp (and had better be!); they're just optimized a bit.
Thank you, Tom. I'll post my updated patch shortly.
In the meantime, can anyone suggest an easy way to populate a table
full of random strings so that I can do a bit of benchmarking?
Thanks,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-07-07 20:15:03 | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-07 20:10:14 | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 |