Re: (auto)vacuum truncate exclusive lock

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (auto)vacuum truncate exclusive lock
Date: 2013-04-18 15:46:24
Message-ID: 51701550.2050002@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/18/2013 11:44 AM, Jan Wieck wrote:

> Yes, that was the rationale behind it combined with "don't change
> function call sequences and more" all over the place.

function call signatures

--
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ants Aasma 2013-04-18 16:48:01 Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2013-04-18 15:44:45 Re: (auto)vacuum truncate exclusive lock