Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch
Date: 2006-08-17 23:11:25
Message-ID: 516.1155856285@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Revised patch enclosed, now believed to be production ready. This
>> implements regular log switching using the archive_timeout GUC.

> Further patch enclosed implementing these changes plus the record type
> version of pg_xlogfile_name_offset()

Applied with minor changes --- it seemed better to me to put tracking of
the last xlog switch time directly into xlog.c, instead of having the
bgwriter code try to determine whether a switch had happened recently.

I noticed a minor annoyance while testing: when the system is completely
idle, you get a forced segment switch every checkpoint_timeout seconds,
even though there is nothing useful to log. The checkpoint code is
smart enough not to do a checkpoint if nothing has happened since the
last one, and the xlog switch code is smart enough not to do a switch
if nothing has happened since the last one ... but they aren't talking
to each other and so each one's change looks like "something happened"
to the other one. I'm not sure how much trouble it's worth taking to
prevent this scenario, though. If you can't afford a WAL file switch
every five minutes, you probably shouldn't be using archive_timeout
anyway ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-18 00:01:00 Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-08-17 22:29:26 Can I assume there's only one _RETURN rule?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2006-08-18 00:02:30 Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-08-17 21:10:45 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes